System for highly linear phase modulation

ABSTRACT

System for highly linear phase modulation. Apparatus is provided for linear phase modulation utilizing a phase-locked loop (PLL). The apparatus includes a PLL utilizing fractional N synthesis to realize a non-integer divide value. A two-port voltage-controlled oscillator includes a first port controlled by the phase-locked loop and a second port accessed for direct modulation. A second input to the fractional-N phase-locked loop is provided to remove the modulation introduced at the second port. Lastly, a calibration loop is provided wherein a frequency offset applied at the second port is adjusted until it cancels the effects of a known frequency offset introduced to the fractional-N phase-locked loop.

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims the benefit of priority from a pending U.S. Provisional Patent Application entitled “HIGHLY LINEAR PHASE MODULATION” serial No. 60/374,040 filed on Apr. 19, 2002, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety for all purposes.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates generally to phase modulators, and more particularly, to a highly linear architecture for direct phase modulation of a phase-locked loop.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Phase modulation schemes—techniques that convey information using the phase of the carrier signal—are effective communication methods. A popular phase modulation scheme is quaternary phase shift keying (QPSK).

FIG. 1 shows a constellation diagram that illustrates how QPSK maps two-bit digital data to one of four offsets. FIG. 2 shows a typical QPSK (or I/Q) modulator used to generate a phase-modulated signal. This technique relies on orthogonal signal vectors to realize the phase offsets—an inherently linear technique, since it depends solely on the matching of these orthogonal signals.

However, the typical I/Q modulator requires several power-consuming circuits to generate the orthogonal signals. It would therefore be advantageous to have a low-power highly linear phase modulator that is highly integrated.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention comprises a very efficient system for highly-linear phase modulation. The system includes important calibration circuitry for direct modulation of the VCO used in a phase-locked loop to synthesize a radio frequency carrier signal.

In one embodiment, apparatus is provided for linear phase modulation utilizing a phase-locked loop (PLL). The apparatus includes a PLL utilizing fractional N synthesis to realize a non-integer divide value. A two-port voltage-controlled oscillator includes a first port controlled by the phase-locked loop and a second port accessed for direct modulation. A second input to the fractional-N phase-locked loop is provided to remove the modulation introduced at the second port. Lastly, a calibration loop is provided wherein a frequency offset applied at the second port is adjusted until it cancels the effects of a known frequency offset introduced to the fractional-N phase-locked loop.

In one embodiment, apparatus is provided for linear phase modulation utilizing a phase-locked loop. The apparatus comprises a phase-locked loop (PLL), utilizing fractional N synthesis, where an N counter in a feedback loop is pseudo-randomly switched between integer values to realize a non-integer divide value. The apparatus also comprises a two-port voltage-controlled oscillator, the first port controlled by the phase-locked loop and a second port accessed for direct modulation. In one embodiment, the second port utilizes MOSFET capacitors that present an effective capacitance to the voltage-controlled oscillator equal to the time-averaged value of two capacitances, the value linearly changing with the applied control voltage. A second input to the fractional-N phase-locked loop is provided to remove the phase modulation introduced at the voltage-controlled oscillator. Lastly, a calibration loop is provided wherein a frequency offset applied at the voltage-controlled oscillator's second port is adjusted until it cancels the effects of a known frequency offset introduced to the fractional-N phase-locked loop.

In another embodiment included in the present invention, apparatus is provided for calibration of a phase-locked loop used for phase modulation. The apparatus comprises a sampling circuit that stores the control voltage of the phase-locked loop. The control voltage indicates the nominal operating point of the loop. A window comparator is provided that compares the sampled control voltage and nominal operating point of the loop to the present control voltage after modulation is applied. A control network accepts the output of the window comparator and properly sets a memory register used to control a digital-to-analog converter. Lastly, a digital-to-analog converter generates the reference level for a second digital-to-analog converter for inputting digital phase modulation data.

In another embodiment included in the present invention, a method is provided for calibration of a phase-locked loop used for phase modulation. The method comprises steps of sampling the control voltage when the phase-locked loop is phase locked and operating normally, altering the data input applied to the N counter of the phase-locked loop so as to shift its operating frequency, stepping the data input applied to the phase modulation input that directly connects to the second control port of the voltage-controlled oscillator of the phase-locked loop so as to achieve a frequency shift, monitoring the control voltage of the phase-locked loop and comparing it to the sampled control voltage corresponding to the nominal operating point of the phase-locked loop and measured before the frequency offset data was applied, and adjusting the scaling factor or reference level associated with the digital-to-analog converter used to convert the phase modulation digital input to an analog signal until the frequency shift introduced by way of the phase modulation input and voltage-controlled oscillator cancels the programmed frequency offset entered by way of the N counter of the phase-locked loop as measured by the window comparator, which compares the sampled and current values of the phase-locked loop's control voltage.

In another embodiment included in the present invention, a method is provided for sampling the control voltage of a phase-locked loop using a digital-to-analog converter. The method comprises steps of establishing an adjustable reference using a pair of resistors, connected to a fixed bias current source and a variable current source, comparing the adjustable reference to the control voltage to be duplicated, and adjusting the digital input to a digital-to-analog converter, used to create the variable current source that offsets the adjustable reference, until the reference matches the control voltage to be sampled.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The foregoing aspects and the attendant advantages of the embodiments described herein will become more readily apparent by reference to the following detailed description when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings wherein:

FIG. 1 shows a constellation diagram that illustrates how QPSK maps two-bit digital data to one of four offsets;

FIG. 2 shows a diagram of a typical I/Q modulator,

FIG. 3 shows a PLL that is used to synthesize a radio frequency carrier signal;

FIG. 4 shows a mathematical model of the PLL shown in FIG. 3;

FIG. 5 shows one embodiment of a fractional-N PLL;

FIG. 6 shows one embodiment of a direct synthesis modulator that supports direct frequency or phase modulation in accordance with the present invention;

FIG. 7 shows a detailed view of a VCO;

FIG. 8 shows one embodiment of a VCO tank circuit with coarse tuning capacitors suitable for use in a VCO in accordance with the present invention;

FIG. 9 shows one embodiment of a VCO tank circuit that includes an auxiliary port in accordance with the present invention;

FIG. 10 shows graphs that illustrate how the auxiliary circuitry uses the MOSFET capacitor to achieve a linear response in accordance with the present invention;

FIG. 11 shows how a lock signal output from a lock detector causes the control voltage v_(ctrl) to be sampled and/or duplicated;

FIG. 12 shows a detailed diagram of one embodiment of a sampling circuit used to perform a V_(ctl) sampling operation;

FIG. 13 shows one embodiment of another sampling circuit that uses a digital-to-analog converter to duplicate the control voltage v_(ctrl);

FIG. 14 shows a successive approximation algorithm for use with the sampling circuit shown in FIG. 13;

FIG. 15 shows one embodiment of a direct synthesis modulator that is part of the above calibration sequence after sampling the control voltage v_(ctrl) is completed;

FIG. 16 shows how, in one embodiment, an adjustment ΔN is simply added to the fractional component of N used to ΔΣ modulate the counter shown in FIG. 15;

FIG. 17 shows one embodiment of a successive approximation algorithm used to adjust the programmable current I_(P) in accordance with the present invention;

FIG. 18 show one embodiment of a network 1800 for generating the programmable current I_(P) in accordance with the present invention;

FIG. 19 show one embodiment of a network 1900 for generating the programmable current I_(P) in accordance with the present invention;

FIG. 20 shows graphs that illustrate the settling time for the ΔΣ-modulated data representing the N value applied to the counter of the fractional-N PLL in accordance with the present invention; and

FIG. 21 shows a communication network 2100 that includes various communication devices that comprise a highly-linear phase modulator constructed in accordance with the present invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

FIG. 3 shows a phase-locked loop (PLL) that is used to synthesize a radio frequency carrier signal. The PLL forms a feedback system that consists of a voltage-controlled oscillator (VCO), N counter, phase/frequency detector (P/FD), charge pump (CP) and RC integration filter.

FIG. 4 shows a mathematical model of the PLL shown in FIG. 3. The VCO produces an output signal at a frequency set by control voltage v_(ctrl) that can be expressed as;

v _(out)(t)=A _(c) cos(ω_(free) t+K _(vco) ∫v _(ctrl)(t)dt)

where ω_(free) is the free-running frequency of the VCO and K_(vco) is its gain function. The gain function K_(vco) describes the relationship between the excess phase of the carrier Φ_(out)(s) and the control voltage v_(ctrl), i.e.; $\frac{\Phi_{out}(s)}{v_{ctrl}(s)} = \frac{K_{vco}}{s}$

The N counter simply divides the output phase Φ_(out)(s) by N. When the PLL is locked, the phase detector (P/FD) and CP combination generate an output signal i_(CP)(s) that is proportional to the phase difference Δθ between two periodic signals that are input to the P/FD. The output signal i_(CP)(s) can be expressed as; ${i_{CP}(s)} = {K_{PD}\frac{\Delta \quad {\theta (s)}}{2\quad \pi}}$

A simple integration filter, consisting of resistor R and capacitor C, transforms the output signal i_(CP)(s) to the control voltage v_(ctrl) as follows; ${v_{ctrl}(s)} = {{i_{cp}(s)}\left( {R + \frac{1}{sC}} \right)}$

Combining the above transfer functions yields the composite transfer function; ${T(s)} = \frac{K_{PD}{K_{VCO}\left( {{Rs} + \frac{1}{C}} \right)}}{s^{2} + {K_{PD}K_{VCO}\frac{1}{N}\left( {{Rs} + \frac{1}{C}} \right)}}$

where a zero (at 1/RC) has been added to the second order system to stabilize it.

The PLL generates an output signal at the frequency,

f _(VCO) =Nf _(REF)

where N is the value of the N counter.

FIG. 5 shows one embodiment of a fractional-N PLL 500. In the PLL 500, N takes on fractional values by alternating between integer values of the counter 502. The alternating process is typically controlled and randomized by a ΔΣ modulator 504, which has the benefit of pushing spurious energy (due to the alternating values of N) outside the bandwidth of the PLL.

In practice, the counter 502 is a multi-modulus prescaler. It is typically controlled by a two-bit modulator that produces a random sequence that in turn selects one of four counter values, namely, n−1, n, n+1, and n+2. As the length of the random sequence grows, the effective value of N approaches,

N=E[n]=n−p _((n−1 )) +p _((n+1))+2p _((n+2))

where p_((n)) is the probability of counter value n. Note that a three-bit modulator is also practical, and generates eight possible outputs that correspond to counter values from n−3, and n+4.)

FIG. 6 shows one embodiment of a direct synthesis modulator 600 that supports direct frequency or phase modulation in accordance with the present invention. In one embodiment, the direct synthesis modulator 600 comprises a modification of a fractional-N PLL, for example, the fractional-N PLL shown in FIG. 5. The modulator 600 introduces modulation at an auxiliary port 602 of the VCO 604 and then attenuates it at the N counter 606, prior to the phase detector 608 so as to prevent attenuation of the modulation by the PLL's feedback. Note that the auxiliary port 602 of the VCO 604 controls the oscillator's frequency, not its phase. To shift the oscillator's phase, akin to phase modulation, the modulation signal must be differentiated with, ${f(t)} = {{\frac{}{t}\left\lbrack {{f_{c}t} + {\theta (t)}} \right\rbrack} = {f_{c} + \frac{{\theta (t)}}{t}}}$

where f_(c) is the carrier frequency. Since the phase signal 610 is formed digitally and then converted to analog form, a simple digital difference circuit 612 is used to compute the derivative of the discrete phase data θ(x) as follows;

dθ(x+1)=θ(x+1)−dθ(x)

where x is the sample index and dθ(x) is the difference or derivative. The differentiated data is then modulated to match the data rate of the control signal feeding the N counter 606. A low pass filter 614 smoothes the phase signal 610 before it is applied to the auxiliary port 602 of the VCO.

Phase modulation schemes generally operate linearly to achieve the prescribed phase shifts without distortion and frequency spreading. This is especially challenging for the direct synthesis approach because of three issues. First, the operation of the charge pump 616 and VCO 604 changes (at different levels of v_(ctrl)), affecting the response of the PLL. Second, the capacitance of the VCO 604 changes nonlinearly (as the control voltage at the auxiliary port (also referred to as the control voltage V_(aux)) moves and thus introduces distortion. Third, the PLL's feedback alters the applied modulation.

FIG. 7 shows a detailed view of a VCO 700. The VCO 700 oscillates at a frequency set by the resonance of an LC tank circuit 702 that comprises inductors L₁, L₂ and capacitor C₁. A variable capacitor C₂ (shown as C_(2a) and C_(2b) and that can be realized as a varactor diode) allows the VCO 700 to be tuned to different radio frequencies.

Ideally, the control signal v_(ctrl) applied to the variable capacitor C₂ is midway between ground and V₊ as this centers the operation of a charge pump circuit (not shown), which produces the control signal v_(ctrl). In one embodiment, the desired range of the control signal v_(ctrl) can be achieved by adding coarse-tuning capacitors to the tank circuit 702. The capacitors C_(3a) and C_(3b) cross-couple the output signal (V_(LO)) to a transistor differential pair (Q1, Q2) to sustain oscillation.

FIG. 8 shows one embodiment of a VCO tank circuit 800 with coarse tuning capacitors suitable for use in a VCO in accordance with the present invention. In one embodiment, the coarse tuning capacitors (C_(T1a), C_(T1b), C_(T2a), and C_(T2b)) are binary weighted and subdivide the tuning range. In other embodiments, other capacitor weightings are possible. The switches (S_(1a), S_(2a), S_(1b) and S_(2b)) operate to selectively connect the coarse tuning capacitors to the tank circuit and thereby adjust the control range of the control signal v_(ctrl).

FIG. 9 shows one embodiment of a VCO tank circuit 900 that includes an auxiliary port 902 in accordance with the present invention. The auxiliary port 902 comprises auxiliary circuitry 904 that is connected to the LC tank 900. The auxiliary circuitry 904 comprises MOSFET capacitors to achieve a linear response even though this device individually displays an abrupt response. The auxiliary circuitry 904 receives a voltage signal (V₊) and a modification signal (V_(mod)) to adjust the operation of the tank circuit 900.

FIG. 10 shows graphs that illustrate how the auxiliary circuitry 904 uses the MOSFET capacitor to achieve a linear response in accordance with the present invention. Linear response results because of the way the MOSFET transistor is used. The MOSFET transistor is nominally biased at its threshold voltage (V_(T)), corresponding to the transition in the capacitance curve expressed as;

V _(GB(nom)) =V ₊ −V _(mod) =V _(T)

where V_(GB) is the applied gate-to-bulk voltage. As the VCO output (V_(LO)) swings, the bias applied to the MOSFET switches its capacitance between two extreme values, C_(min) and C_(max), effectively averaging the two values. But, the phase modulation signal (v_(mod), also referred to as v_(aux)) also affects the bias applied to the MOSFET capacitor. It shifts the time the MOSFET spends at each capacitance value, and since the time shifts linearly (with V_(mod)), the capacitance of the MOSFET (C_(mos)) changes linearly as follows;

C _(mos) =αC _(max)+(1−α)C _(min)

where α is the time (expressed as a percentage of the VCO signal) that the MOSFET presents capacitance C_(max), or equivalently, the time that V_(GB)>V_(T).

Although the MOSFET capacitor shifts linearly, its initial capacitance changes with process parameters (V_(T), C_(min) and C_(max)). This may cause problems because it affects modulation accuracy and also prevents cancellation of the modulation by the N counter. The PLL feedback minimizes any leakage through the N counter (due to incomplete cancellation) by attenuating the intended phase modulation and thereby introducing distortion. To combat this, an innovative calibration scheme is utilized.

The calibration routine sets the VCO's modulation port gain (K_(mod)), which is defined as follows; $k_{mod} = {\frac{1}{s}\frac{\Phi_{out}(s)}{v_{mod}(s)}}$

where Φ_(out)(s)/s corresponds to the excess frequency of the VCO and depends on the initial capacitance (C_(min) and C_(max)) of the MOSFET structure. Scaling the modulation control voltage v_(mod) compensates for capacitance differences.

In one embodiment, a fractional-N PLL locks to the radio frequency designated by the channel data (N). Although this data pseudo-randomly alternates between integer values, the PLL—as evidenced by the control voltage v_(ctrl)—eventually settles. A lock detector monitors the settling response of the PLL and outputs a lock signal indicating when settling is complete. This in turn causes the control voltage to be sampled or duplicated as shown in FIG. 11. This is important because the control voltage v_(ctrl) represents the nominal operating point of the PLL.

The modulation control voltage v_(mod) is generated by a digital-to-analog converter (D/A) and is centered to its mid-value at the start of calibration. This ensures the modulation signal (dθ/dt) can change above and below the common mode level.

FIG. 12 shows a detailed diagram of one embodiment of a sampling circuit used to perform a v_(ctl) sampling operation. The sampling circuit comprises a sample/hold amplifier 1202 controlled by a lock signal 1204 from the lock detector. Although simple, this circuit may be susceptible to hold droop—a phenomenon where the output of the sample/hold amplifier drifts back towards its common level.

FIG. 13 shows one embodiment of another sampling circuit 1300 that uses a digital-to-analog converter to duplicate the control voltage v_(ctrl). In one embodiment, the sampling circuit 1300 operates to find the control voltage v_(ctrl) according to a successive approximation algorithm 1400 illustrated in FIG. 14.

FIG. 14 shows the successive approximation algorithm 1400 for use with the sampling circuit 1300. Upon initialization of the algorithm 1400, the successive approximation register (SAR) 1304 is reset and a small current I_(B1) is pulled through resistors R₁ and R₂ as shown in FIG. 13. This in turn offsets the two reference voltages (V_(REF1) and V_(REF2)) as follows;

 ΔV=V _(REF1) −V _(REF2) =I _(B1) R ₂

and thereby sets a window for the comparators 1302. Note that, initially, V_(REF1) approximately equals V₊; consequently, the comparators indicate v_(ctrl) is less than both V_(REF1) and VREF₂. The control network 1306 then sets the first bit of the SAR 1304, which drives the most-significant-bit (MSB) of the D/A converter 1308. This establishes a current I_(B2) that shifts both V_(REF1) and V_(REF2) as follows;

V _(REF1) =V ₊−(I _(B1) +I _(B2))R ₁ V _(REF2) =V _(REF1) −ΔV

After the comparators 1302 settle, the control network 1306 interprets the results as shown at block 1402. The output of the top comparator indicates whether the SAR bit should be locked or cleared. The bit is locked (block 1404) when v_(ctrl)<V_(REF1) and cleared (block 1406) when v_(ctrl)>V_(REF1). Furthermore, if V_(REF1)>v_(ctrl) and the bottom comparator shows that v_(ctrl)>V_(REF2) (path 1408), the algorithm terminates because v_(ctrl) lies inside the comparator window. Otherwise, if there are more bits to test (block 1410) the next SAR bit is set (block 1412) for testing and the above sequence is repeated. After completion of the v_(ctrl) sampling algorithm 1400, the D/A converter 1308 holds a voltage nearly equal to (and within ΔV of) the control voltage v_(ctrl).

FIG. 15 shows one embodiment of a direct synthesis modulator 1500 that is part of the above calibration sequence after sampling the control voltage V_(ctrl) is completed. A step input 1502 is applied directly to an auxiliary port 1504 of the VCO 1506, effectively raising its frequency of oscillation by Δf_(PM). Simultaneously, the value applied to the N counter 1508 is adjusted to absorb this change in frequency. This is illustrated mathematically by the following; $f_{REF} = \left. \frac{f_{c}}{N}\rightarrow\frac{f_{c} + {\Delta \quad f_{PM}}}{N + {\Delta \quad N}} \right.$

where f_(C) is the frequency of the carrier signal. It follows then that the value N needs to be increased by; ${\Delta \quad N} = \frac{\Delta \quad f_{PM}}{f_{REF}}$

to avoid changing f_(C).

A multiplying D/A converter 1510 interfaces to the auxiliary port 1504 of the VCO 1506. The converter 1510 translates the digital step input 1502 to an analog control voltage, scaling it according to a programmable current I_(p). Ideally, the auxiliary control voltage v_(aux) (or equivalently V_(mod)) exactly produces the intended frequency shift Δf_(PM). In practice, the actual frequency shift can be higher or lower, depending on the characteristics of the MOSFET capacitor within the VCO 1506 and the programmable current I_(P) feeding the D/A converter.

FIG. 16 shows how, in one embodiment, an adjustment ΔN is simply added to the fractional component of N used to ΔΣ modulate the counter 1508. This is practical because Δf_(PM) is usually much less than f_(REF).

The new inputs to the PLL included in direct synthesis modulator 1500 (frequency step and updated counter value) disturb the PLL and force the loop to adjust. Ideally, the PLL settles to the same operating point as before the inputs were applied. If this occurs, then the resulting control voltage v_(ctrl) matches the sampled value, corresponding to the nominal operating point of the PLL. Otherwise, the change in v_(ctrl) indicates the frequency step due to the modulation input v_(aux) has not been cancelled by the loop. That is, if the control voltage v_(ctrl) drifts lower, it means Δf_(PM) was too small, forcing the loop to driver f_(c) higher to compensate. Similarly, if the control voltage v_(ctrl) shifts higher, it means Δf_(PM) was too large.

FIG. 17 shows one embodiment of a successive approximation algorithm 1700 used to adjust the programmable current I_(P) in accordance with the present invention. FIG. 18 show one embodiment of a network 1800 for generating the programmable current I_(P) in accordance with the present invention. FIG. 19 show one embodiment of a network 1900 for generating the programmable current I_(P) in accordance with the present invention.

The algorithm 1700 operates to match the resulting value of v_(ctrl to) its sampled nominal value (stored by the S/H amplifier or alternatively by the D/A converter shown earlier in FIGS. 12 and 13, respectively). In one or more embodiments, the current I_(P) is generated by a separate D/A converter that is initially set at midscale (by the MSB of the associated SAR), using the networks shown in FIGS. 18 and 19. The output of the bottom comparator (1802 or 1902) indicates whether the SAR bit should be locked or cleared. The bit is cleared when V_(REF2)>v_(ctrl) (block 1702) and locked when v_(ctrl)>V_(REF2) (block 1704). Furthermore, if v_(ctrl)>V_(REF2) and the bottom comparator shows that V_(REF1)>v_(ctrl), the algorithm terminates (path 1704) because v_(ctrl) lies inside the comparator window and therefore matches the sampled value of v_(ctrl) (the PLL's nominal operating point). Otherwise, the next SAR bit is set for testing (block 1708) and the above sequence is repeated. Upon completion of the calibration, the program current I_(P) is properly set to meet the modulation accuracy requirements as well as prevent modulation leakage through the N counter (i.e., counter 1508).

It is important for the modulation control voltage v_(aux) to remain centered at its mid-value, especially during calibration, as this fixes one of the calibration points. It follows that the program current I_(P) sets the second calibration point, forcing the slope of the D/A converter (i.e., 1804 or 1904) and the gain associated with the VCO's modulation port (K_(mod)).

The output of the D/A converter consists of two complimentary currents

I _(D/A=mI) _(P) +I _(offset)

where m is the digital modulation data and I_(offset) is an offset current. This offset current tracks the program current I_(P) such that;

I _(offset) =I _(K) −mid[m]I _(p)

with mid[m] equals the mid-value of the D/A converter and I_(K)R corresponds to the desired mid-value of the modulation control voltage v_(aux). Note that R is the effective resistance presented by the filter (i.e., filter 1512). In this way, the mid-value of the D/A converter stays constant during calibration.

The performance of the calibration routine depends on the accuracy of the sampling operation, the hold droop in the sample/hold amplifier, the offsets associated with the window comparator, the resolution of the D/A converter used to generate the program current I_(P), and on the dynamics of the PLL loop. Sound analog design practices address most of these factors, except the last one, which is unique to the direct synthesis modulator.

The dynamics of the PLL loop impact modulation leakage. This is because it is difficult to exactly cancel the frequency modulation (dθ/dt) applied to the VCO. The value of N applied to the counter in a fractional-N PLL is resolved by alternating between integer values. As such, it takes a finite length (or equivalently, time) of the random data sequence to approach the intended N value.

FIG. 20 shows graphs that illustrate the settling time for the ΔΣ-modulated data representing the N value applied to the counter of the fractional-N PLL in accordance with the present invention. Graph 2002 shows a plot of the modulator output. Graph 204 shows a plot illustrating how it takes a finite length (or equivalently, time) of the random data sequence to approach the intended N value. The necessary time is provided by making the PLL loop time constant (reciprocal of the loop bandwidth) large. As a result, the loop attenuates higher frequency modulation, while the counter and the ΔN data cancels lower frequency modulation.

This innovative calibration routine—based on the control voltage applied to the VCO of a direct synthesis modulator—provides the necessary accuracy for direct phase modulation.

FIG. 21 shows a communication network 2100 that includes various communication devices. The devices include a highly-linear phase modulator (PM) constructed in accordance with the present invention. The network 2100 includes multiple network servers, a tablet computer, a personal digital assistant (PDA), a cellular telephone, and an email/pager device all communicating over a wireless data network. Each of the devices includes a highly linear phase modulator in accordance with the present invention. The network 2100 illustrates only some of the devices that may comprise one or more embodiments included in the present invention. However, one or more embodiments included in the present invention are suitable for use in virtually any type of communication device.

In one or more embodiments, a system for highly linear phase modulation is provided. Accordingly, while one or more embodiments of a phase modulator system have been illustrated and described herein, it will be appreciated that various changes can be made to the embodiments without departing from their spirit or essential characteristics. Therefore, the disclosures and descriptions herein are intended to be illustrative, but not limiting, of the scope of the invention, which is set forth in the following claims. 

What is claimed is:
 1. Apparatus for linear phase modulation utilizing a phase-locked loop, the apparatus comprising: a phase-locked loop (PLL), utilizing a fractional N synthesis, where an N counter in a feedback loop is pseudo-randomly switched between integer values to realize a non-integer divide value; a two-port voltage-controlled oscillator, the first port controlled by the phase-locked loop and a second port accessed for direct modulation, the second port utilizing MOSFET capacitors that present an effective capacitance to the voltage-controlled oscillator equal to the time-averaged value of two capacitances, the value linearly changing with the applied control voltage; a second input to the fractional-N phase-locked loop to remove the phase modulation introduced at the voltage-controlled oscillator; and a calibration loop, wherein a frequency offset applied at the voltage-controlled oscillator's second port is adjusted until canceling the effects of a known frequency offset introduced to the fractional-N phase-locked loop.
 2. An apparatus for calibration of a phase-locked loop used for phase modulation, the apparatus comprising: a sampling circuit that stores the control voltage of the phase-locked loop, the control voltage displaying the nominal operating point of the loop; a window comparator that compares the sampled control voltage and nominal operating point of the loop to the present control voltage after modulation is applied; a control network that accepts an output of the window comparator and properly sets a memory register used to control a digital-to-analog converter; and a digital-to-analog converter that generates the reference level for a second digital-to-analog converter for inputting digital phase modulation data.
 3. A phase lock loop circuit that operates to produce a linear phase modulation signal, the phase lock loop circuit comprising: a two-port voltage controlled oscillator that produces the modulation signal at an output port, the oscillator comprising a first port that receives a first oscillator control signal and a second port that receives a second oscillator control signal; an N-counter that is coupled to receive the modulation signal and produce a counter output signal that is used to derive the first oscillator control signal, wherein the N-counter has a control port to receive a counter control signal; and a calibration circuit that outputs the second oscillator control signal and the counter control signal, wherein the calibration circuit operates to adjust a frequency offset provided by the second oscillator control signal until canceling the effects of a known frequency provided by the counter control signal.
 4. The phase lock loop circuit of claim 3, wherein the calibration circuit comprises a difference circuit that receives phase data and produces a derivative of the phase data that is used to generate the second oscillator control signal and the counter control signal.
 5. The phase lock loop circuit of claim 4, wherein the calibration circuit comprises: a modulator that operates to receive the derivative of the phase data and produce a digital modulation signal; a digital to analog converter that operates to receive the digital modulation signal and produce an analog modulation signal; and a filter that operates to receive the analog modulation signal and produce the second oscillator control signal.
 6. The phase lock loop circuit of claim 4, wherein the calibration circuit comprises: a combining circuit that operates to combine the derivative of the phase data and channel data to produce a combined modulation signal; and a modulator that operates to receive the combined modulation signal and produce the counter control signal. 